If you
haven’t heard of Christopher D Spivey, shame on you. You should have by now, if you had your ears to the ground. He’s the most controversial writer of the alternative media.
Chris
Spivey [pronounced Spy-Vee] first hit the head lines as a feature writer for the Sovereign Independent Newspaper. He's a tattoo artist and body piercer, a single father [whose 18 year old
daughter has recently given birth to a healthy baby boy] and the man most likely
to trigger a British revolution.
I first
heard of him via Facebook in 2012, after the Jimmy Savile scandal broke. As far as I can gather he’s just a normal guy from
Rochford in Essex. He’s got two Rottweiler
dogs and he’s built like a brick-shit-house. He raised his daughter alone
since she was 6 months old, and by all accounts he’s a loving father who cares
about the world around him.
Like the
vast majority of the population, I got my news from such places as BBC, Sky,
Channel Four and ITV news programmes. I used to pride myself on having a
comprehensive understanding of the world around me by investing in the 45 minutes
of Newsnight and the hour of Channel Four news everyday. It was only when I
got a Sky box that I discovered other news channels such as Press TV, RT and
the news channels from India,
France and China. Slowly
but surely I found myself watching these channels in favour of the old, finding
them more informative and balanced. Surprisingly, I got really upset when Press
TV [the Iranian news channel] was taken off the airwaves by Ofcom.
I soon came to realise there was a choice in the type of news you
could get. Either the mainstream [MSM] namely BBC, Sky, ITV or the alternative
[AV] which is made up of a diverse set of blogs, newspapers, websites and
programmes screened on obscure TV channels such as Showcase TV, Edge Media TV
and Paradigm Shift TV.
Chris Spivey's articles stuck out as a high-light and my view of the world has been changed irreversibly ever since.
I was once
a Royal Military Policeman who pledged an oath of allegiance to the Queen of England.
I joined the Army ready to kill and be killed for my country. Kill and be
killed on behalf of who I thought then was a great and illustrious Queen.
But reading
Monsters Inc by Chris Spivey [the first article which I read of his] I now consider
our great and illustrious Queen Elizabeth II to be a monster, a charlatan and an immoral
person. Chris Spivey would describe her differently, maybe as a ‘cunt and a slut’
but that’s just how he talks, ‘Don’t cha know’.
Now, I have
been called naive before but I’ve never really agreed with that description. I
like to think of myself as an intelligence free thinking individual who takes
people at face value and who is willing to listen to what anyone says with an
open mind.
If someone
tells me they’ve seen a UFO, I’ll believe them until such time it’s
proven that they’ve lied. If someone says they’ve seen a sex video of the
London Mayor Boris Johnson having rampant sex with Samantha Cameron, the Prime
Minister’s wife, I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt until such time I’ve
seen the tape myself or when they’ve been exposed as a liar. I like people and
take people at face value until such time they have been exposed as frauds or liars.
I’ve read
books recommended by Chris Spivey such as The Falsification of History by John Hamer which totally threw me of kilter and which I’m still recovering from. But
I’ve also read other books which he doesn’t recommend about the subjects he covers, to get a balanced view. Many personalities in the alternative media
ask the reader never to take them at face value and to do their own research on
the subjects they cover.
The reason
I’ve taken Chris Spivey’s articles on board is because they are well crafted, articulated,
researched and written. Another major factor is that I like them. He injects
humour, personality and passion into every piece. If any of you have read his
articles you know he swears like a trooper and if you haven’t yet, you’ll be
shocked by the language he uses. Then there are his pictures he accompanies with
his articles. You have to see them to appreciate their artistic value. But I
understand why he uses such language and images. Number one, he’s real and
doesn’t hold his punches and number two, he’s pissed off and angry with the
status quo.
Make no mistake,
Chris Spivey is writing and circulating articles with libellous accusations.
Quite frankly I am shocked with everything he comes out with. And that is only
because I believed the MSM to be the authority on news and that if it wasn’t
reported by the BBC then it wasn’t true. The AV has changed all that.
Okay, let’s
get down to the nitty gritty…. WHO THE FUCK IS
SPIVEY?
This man
writes well crafted and researched articles which tell, amongst many things:
That David Cameron may have sacrificed his first born to the Devil. [See here for article]
That Lord Mc Alpine is a nonce [as
he likes to call paedophiles]. [See here for article]
and that Madeline McCann is
buried under the drive way of Robert Murat. [See here for article]
'Unbelievable' wouldn’t you say? How can someone circulate such disgusting accusations and get
away with it? Surely this man should be arrested for libel and slander and
thrown into a dark dungeon for the next one hundred years…
But no…. Chris
Spivey backs up every accusation with well researched and verified public
evidence. The proof is there right under the surface and all you have to do is scratch
and see for yourself that he’s onto something. He’s got a point… What he says
rings true… And the blaring FACT that he hasn’t been thrown in prison says a
lot about what he says; namely that the accused daren’t take him to court for
libel because what he says is true.
After all,
Sally Bercow, the wife of the House of Common’s speaker John Bercow, recently
lost her libel case in the High Court for sending a tweet which didn’t specifically
accuse Lord Mc Alpine of being a nonce but yet Chris Spivey specifically calls
Lord Mc Alpine a nonce in dozens of his articles but yet no lawyer has got
in touch.
Giving
credit where credit is due he covers a wide spectrum of subject matters.
Exclusives are common-place. If it wasn’t for him we wouldn’t have known about former
ANC/MK terrorist Heinrich Grosskopt holding and abusing an important position within the NSPCC.
If it wasn’t for him we wouldn’t know the true nature of the renowned MP Tom
Watson. If it wasn’t for him we wouldn’t have known where Madeline McCann’s
body maybe buried. If it wasn’t for him we wouldn’t known a lot of things. Most
importantly, if it wasn’t for him we wouldn’t have known that the British
Establishment and Royal family is invested with perverts, murderers and
Satanists.
He writes
about subjects which are important and relevant. He comments on the news of the
day and wipes away the cloak of mediocrity to unveil the stark truth and reality
of the subject matter. He doesn’t hold punches and lays the facts on the line. He’s
fearless of bullies and doesn’t give a hoot about threats from Lords, Kings or Queens. The man is a brick wall of opinion and righteous stance.
He fights passionately for the rights of children, the downtrodden and abused. If
ever you were in a war, Chris Spivey is the type of guy you’ll want standing
next to you.
Chris
Spivey seems untouchable… And as a consequence very likely to be the one who
triggers a British revolution which will see every MP in the country and Royal
family member put in jail for either sex crimes or treason… [Don’t think it
hasn’t happened before!]
He seems even
more determined than ever to bring the House of Cards crashing to the ground
after the birth of his Grandson.
“Young Clay makes me more determined than ever to see the downfall of
these wholly corrupt, nonce infested, so called democratic governments. I will
not rest till there is real change for the better in this country.
My new little man deserves better. Your children and grandchildren
deserve better… Let’s go to war.”
You might
think that he hasn’t been pulled up because he’s simply irrelevant. A lone
voice in the throng of bloggers and alternative journalists who are epidemic
across the internet…
You’ll be
wrong. Firstly, I’ve heard of him, and I’m your average Joe-the-public type of
guy. I visit his website [www.chrisspivey.org] once a day for any new articles and I’m not alone
because 30,000 to 40,000 others do the same everyday too. He’s a prolific blogger
who checks the newspapers so we don’t have too. If there is any news worth
mentioning, Chris Spivey will bring it to our attention. His following is
increasing everyday and it’ll only increase further with his appearances on the
radio and up coming festivals.
Chris Spivey is
a clear and present danger to the British Establishment and I amongst many,
welcome it.
After all I
agree totally with his sentiment:
“THIS IS WHAT YOU HAVE TO LOOK FORWARD TO YOU FUCKING PLEBS.
The elites raping our kids and getting away with it. And why?
BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL FUCKING NONCES THAT’S WHY! THE ROYAL FAMILY,
THE GOVERNMENT, THE POLICE TOP BRASS, AND THE FUCKING JUDGES TOO. VILE, EVIL,
CHILD RAPISTS.
The quicker the blind cunts who think the likes of us are mad realize
that fact, the sooner we can protect our children. Until that time comes, the
sick cunts with money and power will keep on and on.
WAKEY, FUCKING WAKEY.
I am so fucking angry at the moment, I would fucking hang the Monsters
myself.
CUNTS.”
Suffice to
say Chris Spivey is not going away. I am positive that once EVERYONE embraces
the alternative media and switches of the mainstream news, then a British
revolution is inevitable.
Chris
Spivey has demonstrated through public record and research that our politicians
are criminals, paedophiles and murderers. He has demonstrated beyond
reasonable doubt that the British Royal Family are Satanists, murderers and
frauds.
Chris
Spivey has proven beyond reasonable doubt that EVERYTHING we are told by the
MSM is a lie and that there is an alternative point of view…
Read Chris
Spivey at your own risk. Your opinion of the world will never be the same
again…
Talk is
cheap, especially from politicians. After all, they're widely accepted as liars,
cheats and charlatans, out to feather their nests and feed from the public
trough.
In fact, I could be an MP, at £65,000 a year, what do I need to do?
A deposit of
£500 and ten signatures, win an election and the job is mine.
Easy, but
before I do, lets see who won the last election and make a plan of action.
Of course I
know who my MP is. Having a healthy interest in politics I know itsSimon Kirby.
He looks like
a woman who self-mockingly likened himself to forces sweetheart Dame Vera Lynn.
He's a
millionaire who sold his chain of 28 pubs for £14 million, which he built up
over 10 years with his business partner, the well known TV presenter Martin
Webb.
There is a
radical streak in him. As a teenager while at HastingsGrammar School
he was a member of a group called Hastings Anarchists who attended a protest
against the wedding of Prince Charles and Diana.
Simon Kirby second from end on the right
Since then he
has developed as a successful business man, instrumental in setting up a local
radio station. He now lives in a £2.25 million mansion overlooking Brighton
Marina.
Since
becoming MP he's aligned himself with many good causes such as LGBT community
and, Philip Davies.
Who's Philip
Davies? You may ask…. He’s theMember of Parliament for
Shipley in Bradford Yorkshire. He’s also Simon Kirby's parliamentary buddy.
Philip Davies MP for Shipley
Together
they've introduced the Disabled Persons Parking Badge Bill, which makes a
traffic offence as punishable as threatening someone with a knife.
“Anyone found
guilty of using a stolen disabled parking badge will receive a minimum
custodial sentence of six months,”saidPhilip Davies in the Houses of Commons
on 09 November 2012. (As recorded by Hansards and accessible by all.)
Rather
draconian for a traffic offence don't cha think, was my first thought.
Most traffic
offences carry at best 3 points on your license and a £65 fine for speeding and
at worse 14 years in prison for causing death by dangerous driving.
The Parking
Person Badge Bill will make the fraudulent use of a Blue Badge as severe as
drink driving...
Very
draconian I thought, but Philip Davies is rather proud to be called draconian.
Here's what he said in response to be called just that:
“My honorable
friend makes a very good point. I am quite happy to be found guilty of being
draconian, and I seem to spend my life in Parliament asking for more draconian
sentences for a range of offences. I do not mind his describing me in that way,
because there are far worse things to be described as when it comes to law and
order. I would sooner take the tag of being draconian than the tag of being
soft on dealing with crime.”
As a
prospective member of parliament I personally would shy away from being called draconian.
Doesn't draconian mean being somewhat medieval, cruel and severe?
But hey, who
am I to question the will of the people of Shipley. They voted him in as their
Member of Parliament in May 2005 with a majority of 422 votes.
He must be
doing something right because five years later he retained his seat with a
10,000 majority.
Out of
interest, he was funded by a private interest group called Bearwood Corporate
Services, backed by Lord Ashcroft.
Lord Ashcroft
(LordAshcroft, born 4 March 1946, is
an international businessman, philanthropist and politician, with a personal
fortune in excess of £1Billion, famous for donating to the Tory Party.)
With a margin
so little and then so big, plus a dodgy connection with the corporate sector,
it’s easy to call the elections rigged.
So what else
do we know about Philip Davies?
He mentioned
more than once that he worked for the ASDA supermarket. Here is just one of his
proud reminders to the House.
“I should
make it clear from the start that this subject is very close to my heart.
Members may know that before I entered Parliament I spent many a year working
for Asda.”
ASDA Trolley Boy
It’s from his
experience of working as an ASDA trolley boy, hearing customer complaints of
abuse of the disabled parking bays, that he's compelled to pick up the baton
and drive the Disabled Parking Person Badge Bill into Law.
Without
knowing much about fraudulent users of the Blue badge, I would have thought 3
points on the license and a £60 fine would have been penalty enough.
How many
people hold Blue Badges in Brighton? Google
soon provides the answer at 13,000
How many are
disabled? 13,000, I'd guess.
Is it fair to
scare 13,000 disable badge holders with 6 months of imprisonment and a £5000
fine for abusing their Blue Badges privileges? Disabled people are the most vulnerable
in society and as an MP, I wouldn't vote for any legislation which would
discriminate against them.
Which brings
up an amazing fact about this Bill. A fact that makes this a fraudulent Bill
being passed into Law without the proper checks which Parliament prides itself
on.
Now wait for
it and make sure you are sitting down before I tell you. I warn you this is
outrageous but true.
It hasn't
even had a Second Reading. No, instead it’s had the 'Nod!' instead.
I kid you
not.
As Hansard
quotes on 9 Nov 2012 : Column 1129 Mr Choper as saying,“The point that I was trying to make
is that, although the Bill was discussed briefly in Committee, it was never
debated on Second Reading because it went through on the nod.”
“Went through
on the nod?”... Don't you mean with a Masonic Handshake?
The Speaker
of the House quickly smoothed over this blatant case of Parliamentary fraud.
“Order. The honorable
Gentleman cannot take the opportunity now to initiate a Second Reading debate,
the absence of which he spent some moments lamenting. He must now focus his
remarks on the new clause, accompanying new clauses and amendments. I feel sure
that after that brief diversion that is precisely what he is now minded to do.”
It makes you
dig deeper into the Bill and see what else is being introduced with a nod of
the head.
I have asked
Simon Kirby and Norman Baker to explain themselves and Simon Kirby has been
kind enough to reply.
From:
simon.kirby.mp@parliament.uk
To: matttaylor2000@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Disabled Persons Parking Badge Bill
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:27:00 +0000
Dear Mr Taylor
Thank you for your email.
My Bill had its Second Reading on the 6th July 2012. You can see the progress
of the Bill by following this link:
The provisions of the Bill were debated in detail at various stages of its
passage through Parliament.
Kind regards,
Simon Kirby MP
Member of Parliament for Brighton Kemptown and Peacehaven.
Parliamentary Private Secretary to Rt Hon Hugh Robertson MP, Minister of State
for Sport and Tourism.
Though when
you check out the link, you discover something different to what he implies.
Oh right. Many thanks for
getting back to me.
I'm right to say it’s been passed through without a second reading debate.
So your acertaination that:
The provisions of the Bill were debated in detail at various stages of its
passage through Parliament.
Is incorrect.
Thank you for clarifying it for me.
With kind regards,
Matt Taylor
Prospective Member of Parliament for Kemptown Brighton
To which he
clarified.
Dear Matthew
The Bill was debated at various stages (but not all stages- although it could
have been if parliament had wanted). There were eleven stages in all if you
include royal assent.
Kind Regards
Simon Kirby
Make of
that email exchange what you will. But I’m still under the impression that
their Bill did go through on the ‘nod’ and has not had a second reading debate
on it’s merits and flaws. This demonstrates that laws of the land are being
passed through Parliament without the proper due care, attention, debates and
checks.
Upon further
inspection of the Bill, we quickly find out that the Bill will give sweeping
new powers to plain clothes inspectors to have the power
to confiscate any Blue Badge, with immediate effect, if it doesn't check out
with the Central System.
The
old-style cardboard badges have been replaced by new ones made from a hard
plastic material which contains a number of overt and covert security features,
as used in banknotes and driving licenses.
'Overt and
covert security features' now that’s interesting.
Perhaps
this is the real reason it’s getting the 'nod'. The government are putting in
place a Secret Army of uncover inspectors whose job it'll be to inspect ID
cards, which carry overt and covert information about it's holder.
Its all
scary stuff and by the sound of it, highly fraudulent and stinking of
corruption.
What makes it
worse is that Philip Davies and Simon Kirby are at the helm, steering it
through into Law without the due checks and measures we (the people) rely on
Parliament to make on our behalf.
Upon further
digging, only one word comes to mind in reference to Philip Davies, hypocrite.
A little further digging and the word, 'psychopath' springs to mind too.
After all,
upon hearing someone preach of their desire to punish people, it makes your
ears prick up with concern.
“To stiffen
the penalties for people who fall foul of the rules, who abuse the blue badge
scheme, and knowingly take places away from people who need them, and to treat
such offences with the seriousness with which many constituents treat them.
People are appalled by those who abuse disabled parking spaces and who use blue
badges when they are not entitled to them. I seek to punish them properly.”
As with all psychopaths,
remorse and apathy are alien concepts to them.
As Philip
Davies says “I take the point made by my honorable Friend the Member for Christchurch. There can
be problems if discretion is taken away from the courts, but there are not many
nuances at play in this issue. It is not as if there could be lots of
mitigating factors. We are talking about somebody who is “knowingly using a
fraudulent parking badge” to which they are not entitled. Perhaps I am too
strict on these matters, but I do not see that there could be much mitigation.
I am sure that my honorable Friend, who was a distinguished barrister, could
come up with some marvelous mitigation for one of his clients, but I cannot say
that I would be greatly impressed by it. This is therefore the kind of offence
where a minimum sentence would be useful.”
Or in layman
terms, no sob stories and no mitigating circumstances. Philip Davies doesn't
want the court's to be allowed any discretion on the matter. A minimum
custodial sentence of 6 months, or nothing.
Hypocrite, psychopath
and after watching the first youtube video flagged by Google, paedaphile comes
to mind.
In December
2010 he appeared on a BBC Radio Leeds show and amongst many topics was asked
whether he wanted to see the return of the death penalty.
RP (RADIO
PRESENTER): I want to talk to you about the death penalty. You'd bring it back
won't you?
PD (PHILIP
DAVIES): Yeah
RP: For
who?
PD: For
Murderers?
RP: What
about paedophiles?
PD: Um,
(laugh) we can always, we can, we can, we can have a debate about, like who
qualifies.
RP: Well I
think a paedophile could be worse than a murderer.
PD: Well
maybe, lets not split hairs over this.
I'm still
shaking my head in disbelief, “We can have a debate on who qualifies as a
paedophile?”
The
constituents of Shipley should be asking whether Philip Davies qualifies as a
paedophile?
But it
doesn't stop there, it just gets worse and worse.
He used BBC
license fees to travel to Florida,
to visit death row at the Florida State Penitentiary.
The BBC
Sunday Politics Yorkshire and Lincolnshire
followed Philip Davies to the USA
where he sat in a chair used to kill prisoners, as part of a fact finding
mission looking at the case for capital punishment.
Since when is
the Conservative party considering the reintroduction of the death penalty?
Since when is the EU considering it? Why was this man allowed to go on a free
holiday to DisneyLand, on the premise of researching a subject which
is against the law in the UK?
Yes, he
actually sat in the electric chair as a photo opportunity. As the picture I put
together with Photoshop depicts; you could imagine him thinking to himself “Oh
nice. I could use one of these in my torture dungeon back home.”
Philip Davies admiring an electric chair
It reminds me
of a podcast I once heard from James Corbett of the Corbett Report, who put
forward the case that our leaders are pyschopaths.
Taking into
account his comments on paedophiles and his psychopathic temperament isn't it
fair to surmise that at worse he's a murdering paedophile and at best a
paedophile sympathizer.
Here's a
definition of psychopath to help you see where I'm coming from.
Psychopath is
a personality disorder that has been variously characterized by shallow
emotions (including reduced fear, a lack of empathy, and stress tolerance),
cold-heartedness, egocentricity, superficial charm, manipulativeness,
irresponsibility, impulsivity, criminality, antisocial behaviour, a lack of
remorse, and a parasitic lifestyle.
A parasitic
lifestyle!
A good a time
to highlight his expense claims as any, which also doubles as a perfect
opportunity to further illustrate his hypocrisy.
Firstly we
find an indisputable fact that he's claimed more in expenses than any other
Bradford MP.
We've all
heard of the biblical saying 'Let him who is without sin among you be the first
to throw a stone,” all except Philip Davies.
When former
Labour minister Denis MacShane faced a fresh police investigation after he
resigned as an MP yesterday for fiddling his expenses. Philip Davies was the
first proclaiming from his soap box, raising serious questions about whether Mr
MacShane is guilty of criminal behaviour.
“If someone
has committed an offence then they should face the full force of the law and to
be protected by parliamentary privilege is most unsatisfactory.”
When the
spot light was turned on him we found out he received more than £10,000 in
benefits from companies with links to the gambling industry, while a member on
the influential parliamentary select committee.
Philip
Davies championed the industry's viewpoint during the year-long investigation
into the betting industry, and visited casino resorts in Australia and China's
Macao to see
"high-rollers" in action.
Remember
what he said in the Houses of Parliament about mitigating circumstances?
“Perhaps I
am too strict on these matters, but I do not see that there could be much
mitigation. I am sure that my honorable Friend, who was a distinguished
barrister, could come up with some marvelous mitigation for one of his clients,
but I cannot say that I would be greatly impressed by it.”
But yet he
answers in his defense "to be perfectly honest it never even crossed my
mind. I think it is fair to say that everyone knows I used to be a bookmaker. I
did not think I had interests to declare."
The voters
of Shipley should hang their heads in shame. When are they going to make amends
and demand their MP, face the full force of the law.
Watch is
great footage of Philip Davies asking for a full itinerary of BBC Chairman's
Chris Patten's daily work for the BBC.
Chris Patten
laughed the question off "I think it's a thoroughly impertinent
question".
Though Philip
Davies refused to back down saying“so you don't think license fee
payers are entitled to know how much specific time you are spending working on
their behalf?”
And hammered
his point home "Given you have been presiding over a shambles at the BBC I
think it's perfectly reasonable to say have you been actually putting in the
hours, putting in the yard as you should have been as chairman of the BBC
Trust."
Nearly 6
minutes of Philip Davies drowning on about trivia later, Chris Patten brings a
close to the conversation “You know what..... Um, I'm not sure this socratic
dialogue with you is getting us very far.”
This isn't
the first time he's embarrassed himself in front of a Select Committee. Watch
this footage of him sitting in judgement over Channel Four's equal opportunity
credentials.
He babbled on
for nearly 9 minutes asking the same question to all three of the Channel Four
executives.
Just watch
the equally tiresome Tom Watson MP, sitting opposite showing dirty pictures to
his chum sitting to his right from his mobile.
Just look at
the body language of everyone in the room. They look at Philip Davies as if
he's an imbecile.
He sums up by
asking why the Channel Four executive shouldn't give up his job to someone from
an ethic minority.
The
constituents of Shipley should be asking him the same question.
Why doesn’t
he give up his job to someone from an ethic minority? In fact I challenge him
to put his money where his mouth is and swap roles with me.
I'll go up
to Yorkshire to do his job and receive his benefits and he can come down to Brighton and be with his bum chum buddy Simon Kirby and
receive the benefits I get.
He asked
for a daily iternary from Chris Patten, shouldn'this Shipley constituents be asking him how he spends his time?
By checking
out the ‘They work for you.com website’, Philip Davies spends his days filling
out surveys at £75 a pop, 30 minutes work. A little extra extra extra extra
cash on the side.
That is on
top of his wage of £65,000 a year he gets for as an MP. And the 171,000 he
claimed in 2009 on expenses.
£100,000 of
that was tax payer’s money which he claimed to cover the staff costs of others
doing his job, while he sat in London doing surveys for a little extra extra
extra extra cash on the side.
His office
costs came to £14,000 as did his communication bill. What communication device
costs £14,000 a year I don't know? My communication costs amount to monthly
charges on the mobile phone, land line, broadband and it doesn't come to
anywhere near £14,000.
I've run an
office with my business partner, employing more than 10 staff and our office
running costs never came anywhere near £14,000.
So not only
did he fraudulently deprive the tax payers of £65,000 in a MP's wage because he
spends all day filling out surveys for cash, he fraudulenly rips of a further
£100,000 on staff costs and then another £28,000 on office and communication
costs but he claims a further £23,000 to stay in London and do it.
In 2008/2009
Philip Davies claimed £236,024. Over 3.6 times his yearly wage.
He's on
record as saying parliament is a “Lax regime”. He should know, he's
milked it enough.
This man has
no remorse which demonstrates his psychopathic qualities.
Remember this
indisputable fact-Philip Davies claims more expenses than
any other Bradford MP.
Stop me
banging on about Philip Davis. I haven't even started on his views about the
disabled, which his Blue Badge legislation is meant to serve.
He caused
outrage and anger by suggesting that disabled people should work for less than
the minimum wage to increase their chances of being taken on by employers.
He had the
audacity to stand up in the Commons and say: "If an employer is looking at two candidates, one who has got
disabilities and one who hasn't, and they have got to pay them both the same
rate, I invite you to guess which one the employer is more likely to take on.
Given that some of those people with a learning disability clearly, by
definition, cannot be as productive in their work as somebody who has not got a
disability of that nature, then it was inevitable that, given the employer was
going to have to pay them both the same, they were going to take on the person
who was going to be more productive, less of a risk.”
When asked in
an interview what his achievements have been
since becoming an MP in May 2005, he answered “Not enough”.
But he does
single out two things which he likes to think of as accomplishments.
He's
represented his constituents giving them a very high level of service. Being
fast and assessable and getting involved with local issues.
He is most
proud to have raised things in parliament that other people wouldn't have done,
such as launching the 'Better of out' in Europe
campaign. In which no MP would stand up and say we should leave the EU. And I quote “Some of the things on climate change which
would never have been mentioned without me.”
And to think
Simon Kirby has chosen this man as his partner in crime.
Of-course
there is more to this than meets eye.
Philip Davies
and Simon Kirby have influential backers. Philip Davies has Lord Ashcroft and
Simon Kirby has Norman Baker (also mentioned on the David Joe Neilson Crime
files.)
How else
could the Bill be given the 'Nod' and passed through without a second reading?
Philip Davies
and Simon Kirby are basking in the lime light of cross party support over their
Disabled Persons Parking Badge Bill.
Simon Kirby
is inundated with sycophantic praise. Listen to what Philip Davies says about
him in the Commons “My Right Honorable
member for Kemptown Brighton, is steering the Bill through with great skill,
like an old hand. Indeed, if he can introduce a private Member’s Bill that
finds favour with my honorable Friend the Member for Christchurch, he is doing
particularly well—certainly a lot better than what many others can hope to
achieve—and I congratulate him on that.”
Yes, an old
hand. The Old Hand shake of the Masons have ensured this nasty piece of
legislation is fraudulently passed through Parliament.
But wait
until you read what else I've dug up.
I know Simon
Kirby well enough. He's my MP and his name regularly makes an appearance in the
David Joe Neilson Crime Files.
(The NeilsonCrime Files is a database of local government and Sussex police corruption over the
last 20 years.)
The Neilson Crime Files
It just so
happens that David Joe Neilson is a Blue Badge holder. Perhaps its a covert
plan by Simon Kirby to get him arrested and thrown in jail for 6 months.
I know enough
about Simon Kirby and now I know enough about Philip Davies.
Let's leave
the last word to Norman Baker, MP of Lewes and the Transport Minister, who
reveals the truth of the matter as he sums up.
Norman Baker MP
“There is a consultation process under way on
the personal independence payment, but the Government’s preferred option is one
of minimum change. It is not in any way our intention to reduce the number of
people who qualify for a badge. The consultation has been necessitated by the
changes to the nature of benefits being brought in by the Department for Work
and Pensions, but so far as the Department for Transport is concerned, we want
the result of any consequential changes to stay as close as possible to the
current arrangements. That is our preferred option, but obviously we will look
at the responses to the consultation.”
The
government doesn't want any change. They are happy for the number of Blue Badge
holders to remain the same, but are obliged to tinker with the Statute books to
accommodate the new Personal Independence Payment (PIP) replacing the
Disability Living Allowance (DLA) in April 2013.
This is
about a psychopathic Philip Davies wanting to 'punish people' for his own
sadistic ends. This is about Simon Kirby 'scoring points and basking in the
glory of playing the system so skillfully'. This is about Norman Baker and the
Conservative cabinet, 'fraudulently slipping in legislation which puts plain
clothes inspectors on the streets, with the power of confiscation, in
anticipation of a full scale enforcement of an biometric ID scheme.'
Make no
mistakes. Dangerous men like Philip Davies and Simon Kirby don't get where they
are without considerable help along the way.Philip Davies is being groomed for
greatness, mark my words. An ASDA trolley boy doesn't win an election in 2005
by 422 votes and then by a majority of 10,000 four years later, without lots of
money and lots of fraud.Watch out for him.
Whenever the
Conservatives want to dish out their party line but are too scared to say it,
they'll send out Philip Davies. One in a million. Man of the hour... The UK's version of
George W Bush...
Let’s not
forget Simon Kirby. He's knows what he's doing.
He's getting
praised for being an old hand and a smooth operator when it comes to getting a
Bill on the Statute books.
Perhaps the
'Old Hand Shake of the Mason' makes everything more slippery and durable....
Either way,
Philip Davies and Simon Kirby should be given a taste of their own medicine.
They need to
be locked away for 6 months for defrauding the public. For taking up the space
of two MP's which could be better used by more competent people.
ARREST THESE
MP’S FOR FRAUD, ARREST THESE MP’S IMMEDIATELY……..
This is a
party political expose brought to you by the SOS Party, www.sosparty.co.ukGetting ready
for 2015
The reason
I’ve taken Chris Spivey’s articles on board is because they are well crafted, articulated,
researched and written. Another major factor is that I like them. He injects
humour, personality and passion into every piece. If any of you have read his
articles you know he swears like a trooper and if you haven’t yet, you’ll be
shocked by the language he uses. Then there are his pictures he accompanies with
his articles. You have to see them to appreciate their artistic value. But I
understand why he uses such language and images. Number one, he’s real and
doesn’t hold his punches and number two, he’s pissed off and angry with the
status quo.
